A woman I know, a stepmother, asked me how much time I spend playing with my kids each day.
“None,” I answered.
She was visibly horrified by my answer. “What do you mean?”
“I don’t really play with my kids at all,” I said. “I’m around, but they do their own thing, and I do mine.”
She told me she spends an hour or two playing actively each day after work. She seemed a bit worn out by it, but assumed this was a requirement of child-raising.
“It’s not,” I told her. “If you love it, do it! But you don’t have to.”
Based on how much I shocked her, I wouldn’t be surprised if she now thinks I’m a terrible parent and that my children are on track for future delinquency. But it raised an interesting point that I’ve been considering ever since.
The Demands of ‘Fun Morality’
It seems that, in recent decades, the role of parent has expanded to include the role of personal entertainer. It’s assumed that parents are not only responsible for their child’s physical and emotional well-being, education, socialization, language development, and more, but that they will also rescue the child from boredom and serve as a live-in, on-demand playmate whenever the child wants it.
Back in the 1950s, sociologist Martha Wolfenstein described a new “fun morality,” where the idea of entertaining children and preventing boredom became a new parental responsibility. Quoting Wolfenstein, author Kim Brooks pointed out in Small Animals that, paradoxically, the rise of fun morality coincided with a widespread geographical shift to suburbia and the rise of car culture, which made things even harder for already-stretched parents:
“Just as experts were warning parents of the dangers of child boredom and lack of attention, many families were moving to suburban homes, where ‘yards were often isolated, limiting the capacity of children to join in the kind of spontaneous cohorts that had earlier formed in small-town America.’ The result of this was a parenting culture and experience more demanding than ever before.”
Adults playing with children for extended periods of time on a regular basis is not a natural state. It may be fun for a few spontaneous minutes here and there, but not for a significant chunk of every day. Some people may truly love it (and that’s great, if so), but many parents I’ve spoken to share my sense that it’s mind-numbingly boring.
You Can Do Your Own Thing
I realized this from a young age. I used to do a lot of babysitting, and after hours of engaging directly with children in their various games of dress-up or hide-and-seek or Lego-building, I remember thinking, “I can never be a parent. This would drive me absolutely crazy.” What I didn’t realize is that parenting doesn’t have to be like that.
When you’re a parent, you can fill the long hours by simply going about your day—doing chores, cooking food, doing yard work, running errands, walking places, playing music, visiting with friends, even reading a book outside—and your child tags along. They are entertained by watching and absorbing what’s happening around them. This happens far more naturally when you’re not being paid by the hour to “watch” someone else’s kid.
When left to their own devices, children will inevitably get caught up in games of their own, particularly as they reach toddlerhood and beyond. (Babies do require more active, hands-on play, showing them how to do things.) In fact, children need time and space away from their parents to create imaginary worlds. Too rarely are they afforded “the luxury of being unnoticed, of being left alone,” as described by Mona Simpson.
This is what true free play is—a creative realm apart from adults. Adults do children a disservice by constantly inserting themselves (and their logical, questioning brains) into children’s play. I suspect adult presence impedes many kids’ imaginations from running wild because they may feel self-conscious about what they’re proposing. I wouldn’t be surprised if children’s play took on an artificial, performative aspect in the presence of adults.
You Don’t Have to Do It All
Many authors, from Judith Warner to Pamela Druckerman to Sara Zaske and many others, have famously described the cultural parenting differences between Europe and North America. To play up a stereotype, French mothers sip wine as their children play nearby, whereas American moms climb the playground equipment to satisfy their child’s request for participation.
And yet, as Warner pointed out in Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety, this represents a “breakdown of boundaries between children and adults, and the erosion for many families of any notion of adult time and space.” No one is ever on their own anymore. It's enough to make any parent feel extraordinarily stressed.
I don’t need a book to tell me which of those parenting models, European vs. North American, is more appealing. Not everyone will share my feelings, but I have always felt deeply uncomfortable when participating in children’s games; I prefer to be on the sidelines, a “lifeguard parent”, if you will, usually reading a book and drinking tea unless an emergency requires intervention. I used to feel guilty about this, wondering if there was something wrong with me for not wanting to play “trains” or “dolls” or build blanket forts on repeat, but that dissipated years ago.
I have no problem drawing that line now. When my kids ask me to play, I almost always say no, unless they want to wrestle, which I love, or if they want to do active things, like hiking and biking and swimming. But usually, I tell them:
“My job is to feed you, clothe you, buy toys for you, socialize you, make sure you do well in school, get enough sleep, take you outside, plan family adventures, learn manners, make friends, listen to you and advise you, ensure you’re fit and healthy. I can’t add ‘play with you’ to that list. I’m maxed out. That’s why I gave you siblings!”
I say it kindly, of course, but they get the point. I am their mother, not their playmate. Those are two very different things, and I just can’t do it all.
You Might Also Like:
A Small Reminder:
I am able to write this newsletter twice a week, thanks to generous readers who enjoy my words enough to sign up for a paid subscription! Substack is not exactly a money-maker, but every bit helps—perhaps most of all by validating my belief that I’m on the right track with this quest to reclaim childhood from digital devices. My dream is for this newsletter to become a full-time job someday.
> It seems that, in recent decades, the role of parent has expanded to include the role of personal entertainer
I feel like a missing part of the puzzle here is declining family sizes. It is a lot easier for kids to play without an adult when there are other kids around.
Nowadays kids are more likely to be only children. So no siblings to play with. Fewer kids in the neighbourhood because of demographic changes (older population, lower fertility rates). So no neighbours to play with.
My guess is that declining fertility is the dominant cause of kids not being able to play without parents. They don’t have as many brothers and sisters! And of course this is a macro trend happening all over the world with enormous forces driving it. It ain’t gonna reverse barring a total collapse of modern women’s rights. We are clearly going to need new infrastructure for kids to have that alone free time with other kids in the absence of having 2+ siblings like Ms. Martinko’s kids. (Also they left the city and moved to a small town, which is usually only doable if you have remote work)
Luckily there are lots of people working on exactly this, with Let Grow and the other urban free play movements.
I’ve posted in other threads about this, but it is worth repeating here though: until we get a handle on the (relatively small number but still very influential) number of people undergoing drug-induced psychosis in North American cities and suburbs, European parenting isn’t going to take off. It just isn’t.
I live in Toronto where the bussing policy, to the public school board’s credit, is the same as it has always been: kids are bussed up to grade 5 and in grade 6 they’re expected to take public transit to school. I always loved that and never doubted that my kids would be able to be independent on the bus and subway. But you know what? I ride the subway to work every day and since the lockdowns ended in 2021 there are unpredictable addicts on at least 5% of the train cars I get on. Will my 11 year old daughter be street smart? Yes. She’d learn to go to the other end of the car or change cars. Does that reduce the chances of something happening to an acceptable level? Hell no.
There are unreported incidents all the time. I see serious verbal assaults and threatening movements — aimed at random people of both sexes but of course the impact is different if the guy screaming at you is double your size — at least once every 2 weeks or so.
Same with kids getting to do free street roaming etc. The public safety situation is genuinely different than 10 years ago. We have to fix it. Otherwise kids in small families who can’t play independently with their numerous siblings in their quiet small town streets are going to be stuck with their exhausted parents trying to entertain them.
I wish more of the anti-screen writers (what I call the Haidt-o-Sphere) would write about this more openly.